fix: refactor to have child classes that inherit from RecordValue, but represent the distinct types of value objects that can be returned by the api. fix: added and updated tests to address this refactor
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
import { GuidListRecordValue } from '../src/models/GuidListRecordValue';
|
||||
import { expect } from 'chai';
|
||||
|
||||
describe('GuidListRecordValue', function () {
|
||||
it('should be defined', function () {
|
||||
expect(GuidListRecordValue).to.not.be.undefined;
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should have a constructor', function () {
|
||||
expect(GuidListRecordValue).to.have.property('constructor');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should hav a constructor that takes a fieldId and value', function () {
|
||||
expect(GuidListRecordValue).to.have.lengthOf(2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should have fieldId, value, and type properties', function () {
|
||||
const guidListRecordValue = new GuidListRecordValue(1, []);
|
||||
expect(guidListRecordValue).to.have.property('fieldId');
|
||||
expect(guidListRecordValue).to.have.property('value');
|
||||
expect(guidListRecordValue).to.have.property('type');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should have a constructor that sets its properties correctly', function () {
|
||||
const guidListRecordValue = new GuidListRecordValue(1, []);
|
||||
expect(guidListRecordValue.fieldId).to.equal(1);
|
||||
expect(guidListRecordValue.value).to.deep.equal([]);
|
||||
expect(guidListRecordValue.type).to.equal('GuidList');
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user